Description: Computational agricultural applications based on high performance weather data simulation and hydrological modelling.
The WRF Container Project implements WRF version 4.1.
A comparison of ETo values using ground weather station data and calculated data. The numerically predicted ETo values have been compared to ETo values calculated using data from ZiaMet , a pu weather service provided by New Mexico State University. The study run dates are from 2017-05-25 through 2018-07-31. The R^2 values ranged from 0.83 to 0.94, with an average of 0.88 over the nine sites. Accumulated ETo error percentages range from 0.3 to 13.6 with an average of 7.4 percent. More detail can be found he
The GDC model output has been compared to ground sensed Grow Degree units from ZiaMet , a public weather service provided by New Mexico State University. Nine weather stations were studied with an average sample size of 692 days. The R^2 values ranged from 0.96 to 0.98, with an average of 0.97 over the nine sites. Error percentages range from 0.2 to 13.6, with an average of 6.0 percent. Details can be found here .
PlanetaryImaging.org - Satellite Tracking and Reception
PlanetaryImaging.org - Satellite Tracking and Reception
Agrineer.org - Computational Agriculture
Agrineer.org - Computational Agriculture
PlanetaryImaging.org - Satellite Tracking and Reception