Derrida states that deconstruction is not a critique in the Kantian sense. [1] : 3 This is because Kant defines the term critique as the opposite of dogmatism . For Derrida, it is not possible to escape the dogmatic baggage of the language we use in order to perform a pure critique in the Kantian sense. Language is dogmatic because it is inescapably metaphysical . Derrida argues that language is inescapably metaphysical because it is made up of signifiers that only refer to that which transcends them—the s
Derrida states that deconstruction is not an analysis in the traditional sense. [1] : 3 This is because the possibility of analysis is predicated on the possibility of breaking up the text being analysed into elemental component parts. Derrida argues that there are no self-sufficient units of meaning in a text, because individual words or sentences in a text can only be properly understood in terms of how they fit into the larger structure of the text and language itself. For more on Derrida's theory of me
Derrida states that his use of the word deconstruction first took place in a context in which " structuralism was dominant" and deconstruction's meaning is within this context. Derrida states that deconstruction is an "antistructuralist gesture" because "[s]tructures were to be undone, decomposed, desedimented". At the same time, deconstruction is also a "structuralist gesture" because it is concerned with the structure of texts. So, deconstruction involves "a certain attention to structures" [1] : 2 and t
bitcoin miner script roblox 2022